
Black-Hole Chan, a living black hole; Credits to Ink-ami
Summary
In fiction, the usage of the idea of a Black Hole is not uncommon. Typically within a story, they are treated as a heavily destructive force of nature. However, as a result of this, trying to quantify a black hole and it's power can vary drastically on circumstances. There are actual methods on how to quantify the power of black holes and this page is meant to summerize how to calculate their power and examples of black holes, in addition to how much it would take to create one of such magnitude.
Attack Potency via Black Holes
The creation of a Black Hole typically is indifferent from creating celestial bodies, such as planets or stars, which respectively are planet level and star level. However, where a black hole differs is it's mass, which can change how powerful they are (and to extension, those who create said black hole). Typically black holes have solar masses that differ from about 5 to even several tens worth. In fiction, characters can create black holes both large and small, so here's how they are calculated

Schwarzschild Radius Formula
where:
- rs is the Schwarzschild radius (radius of the event horizon);
- G is the gravitational constant;
- M is the mass of the object;
- c is the speed of light in vacuum.
So when the size is found, then the value for M can easily be solved
To make a rough estimate, one can compare the black hole's size to a celestial body, such as the planet or even the sun, of which makes it baseline planet level and star level respectively. When the requirements for what a black hole is are met, then using the formula above can also suffice as a means to quantify AP from a black hole
Calculators better suited for the job can include these two, which are easily accessible for use
Black Hole Magnitudes
Size References | Radius/Size (Meters) | Joules | How Many Earth/Suns | Tier |
---|---|---|---|---|
Carpenter Ant | 0.009525 Meters | 2.671038e+32 | 1.074 Earths | Planet Level |
Coleoptera | 0.2 Meters | 5.608185e+33 | 22.55 Earths | Planet Level |
Stick Insect | 0.3302 Meters | 9.259101e+33 | 37.23 Earths | Planet Level |
Largest Stick Insect | 0.64 Meters | 1.7946192e+34 | 72.16 Earths | Large Planet Level |
Lion | 1.70688 Meters | 4.7859828e+34 | 192.44 Earths | Large Planet Level |
Human | 1.73736 Meters | 4.8715356e+34 | 195.88 Earths | Large Planet Level |
Alligator | 2.98704 Meters | 8.376216e+34 | 336.8 Earths | Large Planet Level |
Giraffe/Average Building | 4.2672 Meters | 1.1964957e+35 | 481.1 Earths | Large Planet Level |
Blue Whale | 24.0792 Meters | 7.008366e+35 | 2,818 Earths | Large Planet Level |
Average Mountain | 609.6 Meters | 1.7093151e+37 | 68,730 Earths | Large Planet Level |
Burj Khalifa | 828 Meters | 2.3216891e+37 | 93,353 Earths | Large Planet Level |
Mount Everest | 8,848 Meters | 2.4809665e+38 | 93,353 Earths | Dwarf Star Level |
Chicxulub Meteor | 11000 Meters | 2.1200732e+42 | 3.724 Suns | Star Level |
Olympus Mons | 21,000 Meters | 4.0471537e+42 | 7.109 Suns | Large Star Level |
Ceres | 473,002.295 Meters | 9.1156316e+43 | 160.12 Suns | Large Star Level |
Pluto | 1188307.42 Meters | 2.2902939e+44 | 402.3 Suns | Large Star Level |
The Moon | 1737125.914 Meters | 3.347484e+44 | 588 Suns | Large Star Level |
Mercury | 2439765.5 Meters | 4.7018487e+44 | 825.9 Suns | Large Star Level |
Earth | 6371071.027 Meters | 1.2278093e+45 | 2,156.7 Suns | Large Star Level |
Neptune | 24621353.9 Meters | 4.7451155e+45 | 8,335 Suns | Solar System Level |
Jupiter | 69911512.7 Meters | 1.3473054e+46 | 23,666 Suns | Solar System Level |
The Sun | 149597870700 Meters | 2.8830476e+49 | 50,641,975 Suns | Solar System Level |
The Solar System | 287460000000000 Meters | 5.5399242e+52 | 97,311,157,896 Suns | Solar System Level |
Notes
- This doesn't account for the notion that animals can vary in size. In the Black Hole Magnitude section, we used both low end and high ends as far as size goes for some organisms. This means this isn't entirely accurate and would be case by case. That being said, with information is presented is correct, just not going to be universally applicable as a result of variables in both animal size and other factors that might not even relate to this