Thread:OBWforumsContentRevision/@comment-38504076-20190310150126/@comment-38516214-20190315150330

And could you actually read the context in the webcomic and stop strawmaning

you are literally relying on the wiki for your favor and even tried to fool me by saying she was losing power while contradicting the wiki itself

Then i pointed out that the wiki actually said rose was losing her control, not her power but you ignored my point and used strawman fallacy by pointing out rose was on par with jack which it isn't the case at all

in fact you are yet to prove rose having a solid high 2-A feat which makes your "Rose was on par with jack" pointless

And to point out again the wiki said "This can be interpreted as Rose losing control over the dark magic"

Meaning it's not 100% accurate and it's not supported by any statement in the context what so ever

in the context itself, the narrator which in this case was doc scratch didn't mention rose was either losing power or losing her control

doc only said that she will lose against jack and that doc warned her about this

And that means the wiki was assuming that rose was losing control which you took advantage to make your argument that the god tiers of homestuck are high 2-A

and i know you might be asking "But lorax, you said the wiki was the official wiki for homestuck which was confirmed by hussie"

Yeah i said that but you don't need to take every single word as facts

if it isn't supported by actual evidence then we cannot take it as a solid fact

Bad move tod.