Thread:SuperBearNeo X/@comment-30654492-20180522005718/@comment-30654492-20180525235201

PlozAlcachaz wrote: 1. Agreed. Hyperbole feats exist and I believe VS Battles had a discussion on why this was actually a problem for their wiki as well. Asriel Dreemurr is a prime problem of this.

2. Eh... I personally don't see why we should get rid of it. If we get rid of it, we might as well get rid of Low 1-C as well. The point is that common theories and such go up to 11D. To outright be above it dimensionally would be 12D. From a transcendence point, it would make sense to include it since certain being will be implied to be above these cosmologies in fiction. It feels weird to mix mash them with other 1-Bs when they might not have that dimensional implication past that transcendant character as well. I agree with Magi's reasonings as well.

3. I personally think a possibly rating like Magi is proposing should be warranted here. It honestly just seems like they would be on the highest degree possible of 2-A if anything. High 2-A would be for reasons above.

4. Agreed because people will literally abuse a single mention of Quantum Mechanics to upgrade a verse in its entirety.

5. I believe this one is fine as well. This is a problem I generally see as well.

- Additional Propositions (Mine)

1. Distinguish a Low 3-A & 3-A. Low 3-A would be normal universe busting of something on the scale of the observable universe. Low 3-A would be the common baseline for universe busting considering this is the commonality. 3-A would just be the busting of multiple universes worth of matter or something bigger in degree with more matter that the observable universe to a potential higher finite scale. Similar reasoning to Low 1-B. Just throwing in baselines into the same tier as those with multiple doesn't really work. An example of a 3-A by these standards would be Battle of Gods Goku.

2. Distinguish a Low 2-A and 2-A. Pretty much the exact same reasoning as the first one. It is also consistent with the objective of distinguishing certain levels of baseline and higher feats for higher tiers. Low 2-A would be the idea of busting an infinite Multiverse/infinite Universes. 2-A would be the idea of busting multiple infinite Multiverses to a greater amount. If we're treating High 2-A as the busting of infinite infinite multiverses, we might as well make a 2-A. Even then, a 2-A would be the minimum for said level of busting infinite multiverses if certain requirements weren't met. Although, this one is more unlikely. 1.Yeah...I fill Infinite Statements should be taken with a grain of salt (for the most part)

2.Well i mean we don't have Low Complex Multiversal on this wikia...Sooooo

Furthermore what's wrong with mashing them up when it's still beyond the Multiversal Scale, i mean it's still surpassing the scale and shouldn't be indifferent from anything relative to that tier

3.Nah...Honestly it should be treated as High 2-A and is honestly should be enough to show complete superior to 4th Dimensional power

As for your addition suggestions...Imma think about it