Thread:OBWforumsContentRevision/@comment-36060702-20190806222217/@comment-33240622-20190807035832

After checking the requirements for 1-A and 0...

Actually, our explanations for 1-A, High 1-A, and 0 are different from VSB. Going to quote the explanations here.

1-A High 1-A 0
 * Required to be beyond all iterations space-time and spatial dimensions existing as a whole, thus these characters need to be considered "dimensionless"
 * Destruction of infinite-Dimensional space/space-time being insignificant to characters of this level because at this stage, the entire concept of a "dimension" and anything that is related to it would not apply.
 * Extremel;y powerful in comparison to characters who are in 1-A
 * Characters are required to be short of Tier-0, albeit restricted/limited to a character who is at Tier 0.
 * Kind of similar to Tier 0, except that they are limited by a character/thing who can be above them.
 * Requires their existence being beyond everything that can be conceptualized, thus they are considered to be beyond all abstract, mental and physical limitations like Life, Death, Cause and Effect, Dualism, Nonexistence, Existence

You might be right that this could potentially place Buddha as Tier 0, but it might only apply to Buddha only. Especially if... ""The Dharmakaya is free from all conceptual constructs, and is in fact, inconceivable"" this is true.

I do remember seeing that Sun Wukong (after reaching enlightenment) is still considered to be very much inferior to Buddha however, and thus, is subservient to him in comparison. Therefore, even if Buddha is Tier 0, Sun Wukong cannot be in the same tier, because there exists someone who is superior to him.

I know that there is a thread regarding Sun Wukong's tiering somewhere, and explanations for how they got to their current tiering. Personally, I would like to hear their explanations first before considering and making revisions to Sun Wukong's profile.

Tl;dr: Not familiar with Sun Wukong's myth and VSB's explanations on their profile aren't detailed enough so I'll go with your word for it, for now.