Talk:Akasha's Explaination/@comment-30654492-20180405160822/@comment-30654492-20180407205504

Where Do I Start With This

"Shiki hadn't been stated to "kill" the concept of Dimension. However, Akasha's existence is above all theories of every dimension. Thus, this grants her a 1-A tier as she is above all things that collerate to the concept of dimensions itself.

'No Limits Fallacy does not apply in this situation as I am not assuming the maximum value/threshold of Akasha. It is rather, a fact, stated by the context itself."'

Being above all theories and all dimensions in a verse where only 6 Dimensions exist certainly doesn't warrant 1-A tier and it especially doesn't mean Shiki can effect the concept of dimensions in any shape or form

Why wouldn't a NLF apply here when it's literally by definition a NLF. context doesn't matter since it's still a NLF no matter how you look at it

"Appeal to Ignorance Fallacy. The ignorance being that you are completely oblivious to the fact that everything other than Shiki herself, cannot comprehend Akasha at all. It was proven in the link."

That still doesn't warrant 1-A. It shows that Akasha is beyond the perception and understanding of others in the verse but not beyond the concept of Dimensions

"No one has ever came close to comprehend the root, the theories of dimensions can only state that there is a "power" outside from this world. It exists above the theories of dimensions, as I have stated for numerous times above, Akasha isn't bounded by it."'

As i said before...Nothing here stating Akasha itself is outside the concept of dimensions but merely exists outside The Multiverse itself. It's taken out of context to make it seem Akasha created the concept of Dimensions. Which they never did

"Actually, you are the one that have been taking scans out of context without truly comprehend them as one puzzle. "

No...It's the reverse, your scan doesn't aline with anything you've claimed at all

"Negative Proof Fallacy."

First off Fallacy Fallacy. Secondly, since when were the Apps canon and lastly no Shiki being transdualistic needs more to support than just that

"A complete waste of your time to generate this sentence. Wrong use of No-Limits Fallacy. It lies on you to substaniate that this argument is an NLF as it is directly confirmed by the canon source itself. Using a fallacy as an argument for yours, when it is a fallacy in itself, is an Argument From Fallacy."

It's a NLF by definition, as i said above. Just because something is confirmed doesn't mean it isn't a NLF. By this logic Saitama can one punch anyone at full power because ONE says so and ignore the totally fallacious premise

Don't be fooled. I'm down for 1-A Nasuverse but if this is what we got then i'm not riding the train