Thread:LukaSolosYourVerse/@comment-34950152-20180310044449/@comment-32013951-20180310224920

Notice how your argument here changed from "you're misinterpreting the attack descriptions" to "the attack descriptions aren't canon". As for the attack descriptions being canon, it depends on context and what the description entails. "Universal collapse" for instance has a whack description that shouldn't be taken seriously.

When was that stated? I don't remember any of this stuff you're mentioning about amounts of time. She appeared, and her power alone turned the world into chaos. That's literally what was happening in the game. Even if it did happen over time, happening over time doesn't necessarily mean it's a chain reaction. The chaos eats the multiverse over time because that's simply how it works, not because of any chain reactions.

Yes, I know. But that doesn't really prove anything about it being a reaction.

So technically BA actually did have a part in it, is what you're saying? Idk though I remember it happening basically like this: Original world BA gets summoned to remina in her 4th form, she turns into chaos goddess BA and wrecks the world. I always thought that's what caused the paradox in the first place.

Via scaling, Nero and Neris would have AP comparable to other high tiers. The castle thing would probably only apply to their range, and by extension their DC.

Come to think of it, I ought to lower their DC by a lot, since it's dependant on both AP and range. I still think their AP should stay the same.